Why your marketing team is drowning in campaigns but starving for data
Your marketing team launches campaigns constantly but can't prove ROI. Recognise the 5 warning signs and learn the quick fixes that work without hiring a MOPs manager.
Table of contents
- Introduction
- Sign 1: You can't answer "What's our cost per qualified lead?"
- Sign 2: Sales and marketing fight about lead quality weekly
- Sign 3: Your martech stack is a graveyard of unused tools
- Sign 4: Campaign reporting takes two days and is outdated when finished
- Sign 5: You can't connect marketing activities to actual revenue
Introduction
Your marketing team is working harder than ever. More campaigns. More channels. More tools.
But when the CEO asks "What's our marketing ROI?" or the board wants "Which campaigns actually drive revenue?"—you've got nothing.
Most B2B marketing teams between £10-50M ARR hit this wall. They've outgrown "launch and hope" but haven't built the operations to prove value. Reports take days. Attribution is guesswork. Sales debates never end. Your martech stack is a disconnected mess.
This isn't a strategy problem. It's an operations problem.
Here are five unmistakable signs your marketing has outgrown ad-hoc processes—and what to do about each one.
Sign 1: You can't answer "What's our cost per qualified lead?"
The CFO asks: "What did we spend to acquire these 100 customers?" You know ad spend was £50,000, but that's where certainty ends. Tools? Salaries? Events? Which actually worked?
Lead sources get tracked inconsistently. HubSpot forms have UTM parameters. LinkedIn leads say "social media". Event leads live in spreadsheets. Referrals get logged when someone remembers. The result makes confident decisions impossible.
Your attribution defaults to "first touch" or nothing. Prospects engage multiple times before converting, but you only credit the initial channel. The content that convinced them gets zero recognition. Budget decisions copy last year with minor tweaks.
The fix: Build attribution in two weeks
Define your lead stages with objective criteria. MQL meets the scoring threshold. SQL accepted by sales. Opportunity in active pipeline. Customer closed-won. Document entry and exit criteria.
Standardise lead source tracking. "Google Ads - [campaign]" not just "Google". "Organic - [blog post]" not generic "website". "Event - [event name]" not "offline". Clean historical data. Takes 2-3 hours but is essential.
Build a cost-per-lead dashboard tracking total spend per channel. Include ad spend, tools, and allocated time. Calculate cost per lead, cost per SQL, cost per customer. Within 30 days, answer "What's working?" in seconds, shift budget confidently, and prove ROI with data.
Sign 2: Sales and marketing fight about lead quality weekly
Every Monday morning: "These leads are garbage." "We sent 500 leads last month!" Nobody agrees what "good lead" means, so everyone argues from their perspective.
Sales ignores 60% of marketing leads. Marketing blames slow follow-up. Sales blames unqualified contacts. Genuine prospects fall through cracks, buried in noise.
This happens without lead scoring. Every lead looks identical. No SLA between teams. Marketing measures volume, sales measures quality. Handoff process unclear. No feedback loop explaining rejections.
The fix: Implement lead scoring this week
Create scoring combining demographic fit and behaviour. Demographics (max 40 points): job title matches ICP, company size in range, target industry. Behaviour (max 60 points): resource downloads, webinar attendance, pricing page visits, demo requests.
Define thresholds clearly. 0-30 points stay in nurture. 31-60 points become MQLs needing qualification. 61+ points route to sales immediately as SQLs.
Build an SLA both teams sign. Marketing commits to sending only 61+ score leads. Sales commits to 4-hour contact time. Both review lead quality monthly. Debates disappear. Sales focuses on high-intent prospects. Marketing optimises for quality.
Sign 3: Your martech stack is a graveyard of unused tools
Twelve marketing tools. The team uses three regularly. You're spending £5,000+ monthly on tools nobody logs into.
Email lives in Mailchimp, automation in HubSpot, analytics in Google Analytics, ads in native platforms, webinars in Zoom, events in Eventbrite. Data sits in silos. Can't connect dots. New tool added quarterly to "solve" problems. Integrations break, nobody fixes them.
Tools get bought tactically not strategically. No audit of existing capabilities. Different people, different budgets. Nobody owns martech holistically. Fear of consolidation: "What if we need that feature?"
The fix: Audit and consolidate in three weeks
List every tool. Document name, monthly cost, last login, who uses it, what it does, can existing tools replace it? Takes two hours but reveals £2,000-4,000 monthly waste.
Identify redundancies. Email in three places? Analytics in four? Landing pages in two? Common pattern.
Consolidate to the core stack. Marketing automation platform (HubSpot or Marketo) as system of record. Ad platforms native (Google Ads, LinkedIn). Analytics via Google Analytics plus automation platform. Cancel the rest.
Save £2,000-4,000 monthly. Reduce complexity 60%. Data finally connects.
Sign 4: Campaign reporting takes two days and is outdated when finished
"How did last month's campaign perform?" takes 16+ hours to answer. Manually pulling data from five platforms into spreadsheets. Copy-pasting numbers, calculating percentages, making charts. By completion, it's two weeks old. Leadership decides on stale data.
Manual exports from each platform. Excel gymnastics to reconcile. Different definitions across tools. No templates. Reinventing monthly.
The fix: Automate dashboards in one week
Build three core dashboards in HubSpot or Data Studio. Update automatically, no exports.
Dashboard 1: Channel performance shows spend by channel, leads by source, cost per lead, conversion rates. Updates daily. Share with the entire team.
Dashboard 2: Campaign ROI tracks campaign name, total spend, leads generated, pipeline influenced, closed revenue, ROI calculation. Updates weekly. Share with leadership and CFO.
Dashboard 3: Content engagement displays top blog posts, resource downloads, email performance, webinar metrics. Updates weekly. Share with the content team.
Real-time visibility replaces gut-feel. Answer questions in 30 seconds. Make data-driven decisions weekly, not monthly.
Sign 5: You can't connect marketing activities to actual revenue
The CEO asks: "Should we sponsor [Conference X] again?" You know 50 people attended your session. You don't know if any became customers. Same with content: 10,000 blog visits, but revenue impact unknown.
Marketing is viewed as a cost centre not a revenue driver. Budget cuts hit first because ROI is unclear.
Attribution stops at "lead created". No connection to closed deals. Sales closes deals, forgets marketing touchpoints. CRM and automation aren't integrated. Multi-touch seems too complex, so nothing happens.
The fix: Simple multi-touch attribution in two weeks
Implement "positions" model tracking four touchpoints. First touch (how they found you), lead creation (what converted them), opportunity creation (what moved to sales), closed-won (last touch before signing). Give equal credit to all four.
Build closed-loop reporting. When deals close, pull all marketing touchpoints from contact record. Calculate marketing influence: pipeline value times percentage of marketing touchpoints.
Example: £100K deal with three of four touchpoints from marketing equals £75K influenced pipeline.
Prove revenue impact. Defend the budget with data. Shift spend to high-influence activities.
What to do next
Recognised three or more signs? Your marketing has outgrown ad-hoc processes. You don't need a £60-80K MOPs hire yet. You need focused fixes.
Start with a four-week sprint.
- Week 1: build attribution model and cost-per-lead tracking.
- Week 2: implement lead scoring and SLA.
- Week 3: audit and consolidate martech.
- Week 4: automate dashboards and multi-touch attribution.
These quick wins deliver 70% of marketing operations benefits without the full-time hire.
Ready to fix your marketing operations?
Marketick helps B2B scale-ups (£10-50M ARR) implement marketing operations infrastructure in 30-60 days without hiring MOPs teams. We specialise in:
- Attribution modelling: Track which channels drive revenue, not just leads
- Lead scoring and routing: Stop sales-marketing arguments, focus on quality
- Martech optimisation: Consolidate tools, reduce spend, connect data
- Automated dashboards: Real-time visibility, decisions in seconds not days
Book a free 30-minute discovery call. We'll assess your marketing ops maturity, identify which quick wins deliver the biggest impact, and show you the 30-day roadmap to measurable marketing.
Book your discovery callFrequently asked questions
Q: Do I need marketing operations if I only have 2-3 marketing people?
Yes, if you're spending £250K+ annually on marketing or running 10+ campaigns quarterly. Small teams need operations more than large ones because there's no slack capacity. Without systems, you're constantly firefighting instead of growing. Start with attribution and lead scoring. Add more as complexity increases.
Q: How much does marketing operations software cost?
Core marketing ops runs on your existing marketing automation platform (HubSpot, Marketo, Pardot). Total cost including automation, CRM, analytics, and ad platforms: £2,000-5,000 monthly for scale-ups. That's 30-50% the cost of hiring a full-time MOPs manager (£60-80K annually) and delivers similar value if implemented properly.
Q: Can marketing operations improve lead quality or just reporting?
Marketing operations dramatically improves lead quality through scoring and routing. Before scoring, every lead looks identical and sales wastes time on unqualified contacts. After scoring, sales focuses only on high-intent prospects. Typical improvement: sales acceptance rate increases from 40% to 75-80%, and sales cycle shortens by 20-30% because reps work better opportunities.
Q: What's the ROI of implementing marketing operations?
Typical ROI over 12 months for £10-50M ARR companies: 20-35% improvement in marketing efficiency (budget shifted to high-performing channels), 15-25% improvement in lead quality (better scoring and qualification), 40-60% reduction in reporting time (automated dashboards), and 2-4x improvement in attribution accuracy (knowing what actually works). For £500K marketing budget, that's £100-175K additional attributed pipeline.
Q: How long does it take to implement marketing operations?
Foundation implementation: 30-60 days for attribution, lead scoring, martech audit, and dashboards. Advanced capabilities (predictive scoring, ABM, advanced attribution): 90-120 days. Full maturity (marketing resource management, capacity planning, competitive intelligence): 6-12 months. Most companies see measurable improvements (better data, clearer ROI) within first 30 days of implementing basics.
Q: What tools do I need for marketing operations?
Minimum viable stack: marketing automation platform (HubSpot, Marketo), CRM (ideally same vendor as automation), and Google Analytics. That's it. Everything else is optional depending on channels: Google Ads and LinkedIn Campaign Manager for paid, content management for publishing, webinar platform if you run events. Avoid tool bloat. Most scale-ups waste £2,000-4,000 monthly on redundant tools.